It is generally accepted that the implementation of pharmacogenomics and, more broadly, personalized medicine will have to be 'evidence-based'. However, there is a lack of consensus on the level of evidence required to justify the use of pharmacogenomic testing in clinical practice. In the cardiovascular field, this lack of agreement has led to somewhat contradicting recommendations by different organizations regarding the clinical utility and use of pharmacogenomic tests or information. Here, we argue that randomized, controlled trials are paramount in order to enable and accelerate the widespread implementation of pharmacogenomics, not only to demonstrate the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of such tests, but because such level of evidence is required to support the considerable changes associated with the implantation of pharmacogenomics in clinical practice.
Keywords: cardiovascular; clinical trial; dalcetrapib; pharmacogenomics.