In-Hospital Cost Analysis of Total Hip Arthroplasty: Does Surgical Approach Matter?

J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jan;31(1):53-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.08.034. Epub 2015 Aug 29.

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to determine the impact of surgical approach on costs of total hip arthroplasty (THA) from a hospital perspective and to provide an updated cost estimation of THA. A prospective, microcosting analysis was performed on 118 patients undergoing a THA through an anterior, lateral, or posterior approach. We determined that overall costs (intraoperative costs and hospital stay) were significantly less for the anterior ($7300.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7064.49-7535.95) vs lateral ($7853.10; 95% CI, 7577.29-8128.91; P = .031) and anterior vs posterior approach ($8287.46; 95% CI, 7906.42-8668.51; P < .001). A reduction in hospital length of stay when THA was performed through an anterior approach contributed significantly to an overall reduction in costs from a hospital perspective.

Keywords: arthroplasty; cost analysis; economics; hip; surgical approach.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / economics*
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / methods*
  • Female
  • Hospital Costs*
  • Humans
  • Length of Stay / economics*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Models, Economic
  • Prospective Studies