The utility of repeat ultrasound imaging in the follow-up of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients

Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016 Feb;98(2):143-9. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0052. Epub 2016 Jan 7.

Abstract

Introduction: We assessed changes in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties (MoMHAs) after repeat ultrasound examination.

Methods: This retrospective, single-centre cohort study involved all patients undergoing two ultrasound examinations of the same MoMHA. Between 2010 and 2014, 96 ultrasound examinations were performed in 48 MoMHAs (mean time between scans = 1.1 years). A radiologist assigned each scan to one of four grades and measured volumes of any solid/cystic masses. Changes in grade and lesion volume between scans were analysed.

Results: Change in grade between scans was significant (p=0.012); 27% (n=13) of MoMHAs increased in grade, 67% (n=32) had no grade change, and 6% (n=3) decreased in grade. The mean increase in lesion volume was 24.2cm(3) by the second scan, and was significant (p=0.023). Evidence of progression in findings was observed in 54% (26/48) of MoMHAs. Of patients with normal scans initially, 44% (8/18) developed abnormalities. No factors (including blood metal ion concentrations and cup position) were associated significantly with progression of ultrasound findings.

Conclusions: Repeat ultrasound in MoMHA patients demonstrated that findings frequently progress in the short-term. Therefore, regular surveillance of MoMHA patients is important, with ultrasound representing an effective investigation for identifying the development and progression of lesions.

Keywords: Adverse reaction to metal debris; follow-up; hip arthroplasty; metal-on-metal; ultrasound.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / adverse effects
  • Equipment Failure Analysis / methods*
  • Female
  • Hip / diagnostic imaging*
  • Hip / surgery
  • Hip Prosthesis / adverse effects*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Metal-on-Metal Joint Prostheses / adverse effects*
  • Middle Aged
  • Postoperative Complications / diagnostic imaging*
  • Prosthesis Failure
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Ultrasonography