Device-identified atrial fibrillation at pacing clinics. Should it guide anticoagulation?

Int J Cardiol. 2016 Mar 15:207:378-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.01.040. Epub 2016 Jan 7.

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the number of devices implanted following improvement in their safety profile, extension of indications and reduction in cost. Although the reason remains largely the beneficial effect on heart rhythm stabilisation, implanted devices might also have additional advantages, notably identification of silent arrhythmia. Should clinicians therefore act on device-identified atrial fibrillation (AF) and should such identification be used to guide anticoagulation management? This review evaluates the current evidence on the management of device-identified asymptomatic AF.

Keywords: Anticoagulation; Atrial fibrillation; Implanted device; Pacemaker; Stroke; Thromboembolic risk.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Anticoagulants / therapeutic use*
  • Atrial Fibrillation / diagnosis*
  • Atrial Fibrillation / drug therapy
  • Atrial Fibrillation / physiopathology*
  • Cardiac Pacing, Artificial* / methods
  • Electrocardiography / methods
  • Humans
  • Pacemaker, Artificial*
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / methods

Substances

  • Anticoagulants