Guideline-concordant weight-loss programs in an urban area are uncommon and difficult to identify through the internet

Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016 Mar;24(3):583-8. doi: 10.1002/oby.21403. Epub 2016 Feb 10.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the reliability of Internet-based information on community-based weight-loss programs and grade their degree of concordance with 2013 American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, and The Obesity Society weight-management guidelines.

Methods: An online search was conducted for weight-loss programs in the Maryland-Washington, DC-Virginia corridor. Content analysis was performed to abstract program components from their websites, and then 80 programs were randomly selected for a telephone survey to verify this information. Reliability of Internet information was determined in comparison with telephone interview responses.

Results: Of the 191 programs, 1% were graded as high, 8% as moderate, and 91% as low with respect to guideline concordance based on website content. Fifty-two programs participated in the telephone survey (65% response rate). Program intensity, diet, physical activity, and use of behavioral strategies were underreported on websites as compared to description of these activities during the phone interview. Within the subsample, 6% of programs were graded as high based on website information, whereas 19% were graded as high after the telephone interview.

Conclusions: Most weight-loss programs in an urban, mid-Atlantic region do not currently offer guideline-concordant practices and fail to disclose key information online, which may make clinician referrals challenging.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Diet / statistics & numerical data
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Guidelines as Topic*
  • Humans
  • Information Dissemination
  • Information Seeking Behavior
  • Internet / organization & administration*
  • Obesity / therapy*
  • Patient Education as Topic / organization & administration*
  • Patient Participation / statistics & numerical data
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Social Support
  • United States
  • Urban Population / statistics & numerical data*
  • Weight Loss