Young Cervical Cancer Patients May Be More Responsive than Older Patients to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Radical Surgery

PLoS One. 2016 Feb 22;11(2):e0149534. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149534. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effects of age and the clinical response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with cervical cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery.

Methods: A total of 1,014 patients with advanced cervical cancer who received NACT followed by radical surgery were retrospectively selected. Patients were divided into young (aged ≤35 years, n = 177) and older (aged >35 years, n = 837) groups. We compared the short-term responses and survival rates between the groups. The five-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were stratified by age, NACT response, and FIGO stage.

Results: The overall response rate was 86.8% in the young group and 80.9% in the older group. The young patients had an earlier FIGO stage (P<0.001), a higher rate of adenocarcinoma (P = 0.022), and more lymph node metastasis (P = 0.033) than the older patients. The presence of adenocarcinoma as the histological type (P = 0.024) and positive lymph node metastasis (P<0.001) were identified as independent risk factors for survival. When stratified by age and clinical response, young patients with no response to NACT had a worse clinicopathological condition compared with the other subgroups. Compared with non-responders, responders to NACT had a higher five-year DFS rate (80.1% versus 71.8%; P = 0.019) and OS rate (82.6% versus 71.8%; P = 0.003) among the young patients but not among the older patients.

Conclusions: Responders to NACT aged 35 years or younger benefitted the most from NACT, while the young non-responders benefitted the least. Age might represent an important factor to consider when performing NACT in patients with cervical cancer.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Age Factors
  • Aged
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoadjuvant Therapy / methods*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Young Adult

Grants and funding

This study was endorsed by the Key Basic Research and Development Program Foundation of China (973 Program; No. 2015CB553903) and was supported by grants from the NationalNatural Science Foundation of China (NO. 91529102; 81572571; 81402160; 81302267; 81230038; 81230052; 30973472; 81001151;81071663; 30973205; 30973184; 81090414; 81272422; 81172464; 81101964).