Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Bendamustine Plus Rituximab as a First-Line Treatment for Patients with Follicular Lymphoma in Spain

Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016 Aug;14(4):465-477. doi: 10.1007/s40258-016-0243-4.

Abstract

Background: Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the second most common type of lymphoid cancer in Western Europe.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost utility of rituximab-bendamustine treatment compared with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) treatment as a first-line therapy for patients with advanced FL in Spain.

Methods: A Markov model was developed to estimate the cost effectiveness of rituximab-bendamustine compared with R-CHOP as first-line treatment for patients with advanced FL in the Spanish National Health System (NHS). Transitions between health states (progression-free, including induction and maintenance; first relapse; second relapse; and death) were allowed for the patient cohort in 4-week-long cycles. Clinical data for the extrapolation of progression-free survival curves were obtained from randomized trials. Mortality rates and utilities were obtained from the literature. Outcomes were measured as quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). The total costs (€, 2013) included drug costs (ex-factory prices with mandatory deductions), disease management costs and adverse event-associated costs. Costs and outcomes were discounted at a 3 % annual rate. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed using 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations to assess the model robustness.

Results: Treatment and administration costs during the induction phase were higher for rituximab-bendamustine (€17,671) than for R-CHOP (€11,850). At the end of the 25-year period, the rituximab-bendamustine first-line strategy had a total cost of €68,357 compared with €69,528 for R-CHOP. Health benefits were higher for rituximab-bendamustine treatment (10.31 QALYs) than for R-CHOP treatment (9.82 QALYs). In the probabilistic analysis, rituximab-bendamustine was the dominant strategy over treatment with R-CHOP in 53.4 % of the simulations.

Conclusion: First-line therapy with rituximab-bendamustine in FL patients was the dominant strategy over treatment with R-CHOP; it showed cost savings and higher health benefits for the Spanish NHS.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived / economics
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived / therapeutic use
  • Antineoplastic Agents / economics
  • Antineoplastic Agents / therapeutic use
  • Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating / economics
  • Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating / therapeutic use
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / economics*
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use
  • Bendamustine Hydrochloride / economics*
  • Bendamustine Hydrochloride / therapeutic use
  • Costs and Cost Analysis
  • Cyclophosphamide / economics
  • Cyclophosphamide / therapeutic use
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Doxorubicin / economics
  • Doxorubicin / therapeutic use
  • Drug Therapy, Combination / economics
  • Humans
  • Lymphoma, Follicular / drug therapy*
  • Lymphoma, Follicular / economics*
  • Lymphoma, Follicular / mortality
  • Markov Chains
  • Prednisone / economics
  • Prednisone / therapeutic use
  • Quality-Adjusted Life Years
  • Rituximab / economics*
  • Rituximab / therapeutic use
  • Spain / epidemiology
  • Vincristine / economics
  • Vincristine / therapeutic use

Substances

  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived
  • Antineoplastic Agents
  • Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating
  • R-CHOP protocol
  • Rituximab
  • Vincristine
  • Doxorubicin
  • Cyclophosphamide
  • Bendamustine Hydrochloride
  • Prednisone