Effects of heat acclimation on hand cooling efficacy following exercise in the heat

J Sports Sci. 2017 May;35(9):828-834. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1192671. Epub 2016 Jun 8.

Abstract

This study examined the separate and combined effects of heat acclimation and hand cooling on post-exercise cooling rates following bouts of exercise in the heat. Seventeen non-heat acclimated (NHA) males (mean ± SE; age, 23 ± 1 y; mass, 75.30 ± 2.27 kg; maximal oxygen consumption [VO2 max], 54.1 ± 1.3 ml·kg-1·min-1) completed 2 heat stress tests (HST) when NHA, then 10 days of heat acclimation, then 2 HST once heat acclimated (HA) in an environmental chamber (40°C; 40%RH). HSTs were 2 60-min bouts of treadmill exercise (45% VO2 max; 2% grade) each followed by 10 min of hand cooling (C) or no cooling (NC). Heat acclimation sessions were 90-240 min of treadmill or stationary bike exercise (60-80% VO2 max). Repeated measures ANOVA with Fishers LSD post hoc (α < 0.05) identified differences. When NHA, C (0.020 ± 0.003°C·min-1) had a greater cooling rate than NC (0.013 ± 0.003°C·min-1) (mean difference [95%CI]; 0.007°C [0.001,0.013], P = 0.035). Once HA, C (0.021 ± 0.002°C·min-1) was similar to NC (0.025 ± 0.002°C·min-1) (0.004°C [-0.003,0.011], P = 0.216). Hand cooling when HA (0.021 ± 0.002°C·min-1) was similar to when NHA (0.020 ± 0.003°C·min-1) (P = 0.77). In conclusion, when NHA, C provided greater cooling rates than NC. Once HA, C and NC provided similar cooling rates.

Keywords: Rectal temperature; cooling rate; exertional heat illness; grip strength; hyperthermia.

MeSH terms

  • Acclimatization*
  • Body Temperature Regulation
  • Cold Temperature*
  • Exercise / physiology*
  • Hand / anatomy & histology
  • Hand / physiology*
  • Hand Strength
  • Hot Temperature*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Young Adult