Using the PDD Behavior Inventory as a Level 2 Screener: A Classification and Regression Trees Analysis

J Autism Dev Disord. 2016 Sep;46(9):3006-22. doi: 10.1007/s10803-016-2843-0.

Abstract

In order to improve discrimination accuracy between Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and similar neurodevelopmental disorders, a data mining procedure, Classification and Regression Trees (CART), was used on a large multi-site sample of PDD Behavior Inventory (PDDBI) forms on children with and without ASD. Discrimination accuracy exceeded 80 %, generalized to an independent validation set, and generalized across age groups and sites, and agreed well with ADOS classifications. Parent PDDBIs yielded better results than teacher PDDBIs but, when CART predictions agreed across informants, sensitivity increased. Results also revealed three subtypes of ASD: minimally verbal, verbal, and atypical; and two, relatively common subtypes of non-ASD children: social pragmatic problems and good social skills. These subgroups corresponded to differences in behavior profiles and associated bio-medical findings.

Keywords: Autism Spectrum Disorder; Data mining; Decision trees; Genotype; Level 2 screeners; Machine learning; Monoamine Oxidase A; Phenotype; Seizures; Subgroups.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Algorithms
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder / classification
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder / diagnosis*
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder / psychology
  • Child
  • Child Development Disorders, Pervasive / classification
  • Child Development Disorders, Pervasive / diagnosis
  • Child Development Disorders, Pervasive / psychology
  • Child, Preschool
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Machine Learning
  • Male
  • Parents
  • Regression Analysis
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Social Skills*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires