Arthroplasty for tenosynovial giant cell tumors

Acta Orthop. 2016 Oct;87(5):497-503. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1205168. Epub 2016 Jun 30.

Abstract

Background and purpose - Tenosynovial giant cell tumors (t-GCTs) can behave aggressively locally and affect joint function and quality of life. The role of arthroplasty in the treatment of t-GCT is uncertain. We report the results of arthroplasty in t-GCT patients. Patients and methods - t-GCT patients (12 knee, 5 hip) received an arthroplasty between 1985 and 2015. Indication for arthroplasty, recurrences, complications, quality of life, and functional scores were evaluated after a mean follow-up time of 5.5 (0.2-15) years. Results - 2 patients had recurrent disease. 2 other patients had implant loosening. Functional scores showed poor results in almost half of the knee patients. 4 of the hip patients scored excellent and 1 scored fair. Quality of life was reduced in 1 or more subscales for 2 hip patients and for 5 knee patients. Interpretation - In t-GCT patients with extensive disease or osteoarthritis, joint arthroplasty is an additional treatment option. However, recurrences, implant loosening, and other complications do occur, even after several years.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / methods*
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / methods*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Forecasting*
  • Giant Cell Tumor of Tendon Sheath / diagnosis
  • Giant Cell Tumor of Tendon Sheath / surgery*
  • Hip Joint / diagnostic imaging*
  • Hip Joint / surgery
  • Humans
  • Knee Joint / diagnostic imaging*
  • Knee Joint / surgery
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Quality of Life*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Young Adult