Dosimetry intercomparison of four proton therapy institutions in Germany employing spot scanning

Z Med Phys. 2017 Jun;27(2):80-85. doi: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Jul 16.

Abstract

Aim: To verify the consistency of dose and range measurement in an interinstitution comparison among proton therapy institutions in Germany which use the pencil-beam scanning technique.

Methods: Following a peer-to-peer approach absorbed dose and range have been intercompared in several missions at two hosting centers with two or three visiting physics teams of participating institutions using their own dosimetry equipment. A meta-analysis has been performed integrating the results of the individual missions. Dose has been determined with ionization chambers according to the dosimetry protocol IAEA TRS-398. For determination of the depth of the distal 80% dose the teams used either a scanning water phantom, a variable water column or a multi-layer ionization chamber.

Results: The systematic deviation between measured doses of the participating institutions is less than 1%. Ranges differ systematically less than 0.4mm.

Conclusions: The match of measured dose and range is better than expected from the respective uncertainties. As all physics teams agree on the assessment of absorbed dose and range, an important prerequisite for a start of joint clinical studies is fulfilled.

Keywords: Ionisationskammer; Nadelstrahlverfahren; Proton therapy; Protonentherapie; Referenzdosimetrie; Reichweite; dosimetry; ionization chamber; pencil-beam scanning; range.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study

MeSH terms

  • Calibration
  • Germany
  • Humans
  • Phantoms, Imaging
  • Proton Therapy / methods*
  • Radiometry / methods
  • Radiotherapy Dosage*