Background and methods: To evaluate surgical and pathologic outcomes of robotic assisted versus open hysterectomy for women with at least class II (BMI >35) and class III (BMI >40) obesity with endometrial cancer. Women with endometrial cancer and class II obesity, treated with open or robotic hysterectomy between 3/2005 and 3/2013 were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective cohort. Patients with class III obesity were reviewed both within the cohort of class II and as a separate subset. Data were collected on demographics, operative statistics, pathology, post-operative complications, and oncologic outcomes. Tests of significance used Chi-square, Fisher's exact test, t-test, and Wilcoxon rank-sum.
Results: One hundred and thirty-six women with BMI >35 who underwent hysterectomy (56 robotic and 80 abdominal) were included. Patients undergoing robotic hysterectomies had fewer post-operative complications, shorter hospital stays, and lower blood loss compared to the abdominal group. A subset (83 of 136) with class III obesity had similar findings. Operative times, lymph node dissection rates, and lymph node yield (both pelvic and para-aortic) were similar between open and robotic surgery in both obesity classes. Oncologic outcomes and use of adjuvant treatment was not compromised.
Conclusions: Robotic hysterectomy is a safe and effective option for morbidly obese women with endometrial cancer. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:884-887. © 2016 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Keywords: cancer of the endometrium; obesity; robotic surgical procedures.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.