Appendectomy in Pregnancy: Appraisal of the Minimally Invasive Approach

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016 Nov;26(11):893-897. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0280. Epub 2016 Sep 26.

Abstract

Background: The optimal surgical approach to acute appendicitis in pregnancy remains controversial. Our aim was to compare perioperative and obstetric outcomes associated with laparoscopic and open appendectomy in a large contemporary cohort of pregnant women.

Methods: Retrospective review of all women who underwent appendectomy during pregnancy in a single hospital during 2000-2014.

Results: Ninety-two patients met the study criteria. Fifty (54%) underwent laparoscopic appendectomy and 42 (46%) open appendectomy. The laparoscopy group had a lower median gestational age at surgery (16 weeks versus 24 weeks, P < .001), a shorter median hospital stay (5 days versus 3 days, P < .001), and a lower rate of postoperative complications (8% versus 24%, P = .04). There were no significant between-group differences in the rates of gestational age at delivery, Apgar scores, preterm delivery, and fetal loss.

Conclusions: Laparoscopic appendectomy during pregnancy is safe and associated with better surgical outcomes than open appendectomy, with no difference in obstetric outcomes.

Keywords: appendectomy; laparoscopy; pregnancy.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Acute Disease
  • Adult
  • Apgar Score
  • Appendectomy / methods*
  • Appendicitis / surgery*
  • Female
  • Fetal Death
  • Gestational Age*
  • Humans
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Laparoscopy / methods*
  • Laparotomy
  • Length of Stay / statistics & numerical data
  • Male
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures / methods*
  • Postoperative Complications / epidemiology*
  • Pregnancy
  • Pregnancy Complications / surgery*
  • Premature Birth / epidemiology
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Young Adult