[Development of Endothelial Cell Density after Penetrating Keratoplasty in Patients with Fuchs Dystrophy or Keratoconus - Comparison of Excimer Laser and Mechanical Trephination]

Purpose The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the development of endothelial cell density (ECD) after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) in patients with Fuchs dystrophy (FD), keratoconus (KC) or "other diagnoses" (OD), depending on the type of trephination. Patients and Methods In 104 eyes with Fuchs dystrophy, keratoconus or "other diagnoses", the ECD after PKP using either excimer laser (EXC) or mechanical trephination (MECH) was registered after 1.5, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. With linear and exponential regression models, the endothelial cell loss (ECL) was determined as absolute and percentage cell loss per year. Results For the entire group of patients, ECD was significantly higher after EXC-PKP during the full range of follow-up (except 6 months). With a linear regression model, there was no significant difference in the absolute ECL per year (p = 0.084), but with an exponential regression model, there was a significant difference in the percentage ECL per year (p = 0.021) in favour of EXC trephination. For keratoconus (n = 33), except for the 24-month-follow-up (p = 0.035), ECD was not significantly different on the basis of EXC vs. MECH. With a linear regression model, there was a significant difference in the absolute ECL per year (p = 0.015) in favour of EXC-trephination, but with an exponential regression model there was no significant difference in the percentage ECL per year (p = 0.088) between the two types of threphination. In patients with FUCHS (n = 35) - except for the 6-week-follow-up (p = 0.024) - ECD was not significantly different for EXC vs. MECH. With linear/exponential regression model, the ECL per year was not significantly different in favour of any type of trephination (p = 0.287/p = 0.121). In patients with OD (n = 36), ECD was not significantly different for EXC vs. MECH. With a linear/exponential regression model, the ECL per year was not significantly different in favour of any type of trephination (p = 0.494/p = 0.787). Conclusion During the first 24 months after PKP, a significantly higher ECD and a significantly lower percentage of ECL per year was observed after EXC trephination for the entire group of patients. For the different diagnostic groups KC, FD and OD, no significant difference in ECD or ECL loss was noticed over a range of follow-up intervals. This may most likely be attributed to the small number of patients in the three subgroups.