Randomized Multicenter Trial Investigating Angiographic Outcomes of Hybrid Sirolimus-Eluting Stents With Biodegradable Polymer Compared With Everolimus-Eluting Stents With Durable Polymer in Chronic Total Occlusions: The PRISON IV Trial

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jan 23;10(2):133-143. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.10.017.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of the hybrid ultrathin-strut sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) with biodegradable polymer compared with the thin-strut everolimus-eluting stent (EES) with durable polymer in successfully recanalized chronic total occlusions (CTOs).

Background: The introduction of drug-eluting stents revolutionized the treatment of CTOs. However, limited data are available on new-generation drug-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer in CTOs.

Methods: In this multicenter trial, patients were randomized, after successful CTO recanalization, to either SES or EES. The primary noninferiority endpoint was in-segment late lumen loss (noninferiority margin 0.2 mm). Secondary endpoints included in-stent late lumen loss and clinical endpoints.

Results: Overall, 330 patients were included. At 9 months, angiography was available in 281 patients (85%). Duration of occlusion ≥3 months was 92.5%, with mean stent length of 52.4 ± 28.1 mm versus 52.3 ± 26.5 mm in the SES and EES groups. The primary noninferiority endpoint, in-segment late lumen loss, was not met for SES versus EES (0.13 ± 0.63 mm vs. 0.02 ± 0.47 mm; p = 0.08, 2-sided; difference 0.11 mm; 95% confidence interval: -0.01 to 0.25 mm; pnoninferiority = 0.11, 1-sided). In-stent late lumen loss was comparable between SES and EES (0.12 ± 0.59 mm vs. 0.07 ± 0.46 mm; p = 0.52). The incidence of in-stent and in-segment binary restenosis was significantly higher with SES compared with EES (8.0% vs. 2.1%; p = 0.028), with comparable rates of reocclusions (2.2% vs. 1.4%; p = 0.68). Clinically indicated target lesion and target vessel revascularization (9.2% vs. 4.0% [p = 0.08] and 9.2% vs. 6.0% [p = 0.33]), target vessel failure (9.9% vs. 6.6%; p = 0.35), and definite or probable stent thrombosis (0.7% vs. 0.7%; p = 1.00) were comparable between the SES and EES groups.

Conclusions: This randomized trial failed to show noninferiority of hybrid SES relative to EES in terms of in-segment late lumen loss in successfully recanalized CTOs. Furthermore, a statistically significantly higher rate of binary restenosis was found with SES.

Keywords: biodegradable polymer; chronic total occlusion; drug-eluting stent(s); percutaneous coronary intervention.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Absorbable Implants*
  • Aged
  • Belgium
  • Cardiovascular Agents / administration & dosage*
  • Cardiovascular Agents / adverse effects
  • Chronic Disease
  • Coronary Angiography*
  • Coronary Occlusion / diagnostic imaging
  • Coronary Occlusion / therapy*
  • Coronary Restenosis / diagnostic imaging*
  • Coronary Restenosis / etiology
  • Coronary Thrombosis / diagnostic imaging*
  • Coronary Thrombosis / etiology
  • Coronary Vessels / diagnostic imaging*
  • Drug-Eluting Stents*
  • Everolimus / administration & dosage*
  • Everolimus / adverse effects
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Netherlands
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention / adverse effects
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention / instrumentation*
  • Polymers / chemistry*
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Prospective Studies
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Risk Factors
  • Single-Blind Method
  • Sirolimus / administration & dosage*
  • Sirolimus / adverse effects
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Cardiovascular Agents
  • Polymers
  • Everolimus
  • Sirolimus