Identifying Frailty Levels and Associated Factors in a Population Living in the Context of Poverty and Social Vulnerability

J Frailty Aging. 2017;6(1):29-32. doi: 10.14283/jfa.2016.116.

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate a vulnerable population living in the context of poverty in a Brazilian municipality, in order to identify the factors that are associated with frailty syndrome in elderly people. From the total population living in the area, a random sample of 363 community-dwelling people, 60 years and older, age and gender-stratified, was selected to participate in the research. After losses, a sample of 304 older adults was classified as non-frail, pre-frail and frail. According to the Fried frailty criteria, the prevalence was 12.2% for non-frail individuals, 60.5% pre-frail and 27.3% frail. The main factors associated with frailty in the studied sample were low level of physical activity (OR: 5.2, 95%CI: 2.5-11.0), the occurrence of two or more falls within 12 months (OR: 3.1, 95%CI: 1.4-7.1), mobility deficits (OR: 3.0, 95%CI: 1.5-5.8), and depressive symptoms (OR: 1.9, 95%CI: 1.1-3.7). This study identified the most important factors that must be evaluated to identify frailty syndrome in a socially vulnerable population in the context of poverty. The data should help to encourage effective strategies concerning public health policies for this population.

Keywords: Aging; cognition; elderly; frailty; social vulnerability.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Brazil / epidemiology
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Female
  • Frail Elderly / statistics & numerical data
  • Frailty* / diagnosis
  • Frailty* / economics
  • Frailty* / epidemiology
  • Geriatric Assessment / methods
  • Humans
  • Independent Living / standards
  • Independent Living / statistics & numerical data
  • Male
  • Needs Assessment
  • Poverty / statistics & numerical data*
  • Prevalence
  • Public Health* / methods
  • Public Health* / standards
  • Socioeconomic Factors*