Electron Number-Based Phase Diagram of Pr_{1-x}LaCe_{x}CuO_{4-δ} and Possible Absence of Disparity between Electron- and Hole-Doped Cuprate Phase Diagrams

Phys Rev Lett. 2017 Mar 31;118(13):137001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.137001. Epub 2017 Mar 28.

Abstract

We performed annealing and angle resolved photoemission spectroscopy studies on electron-doped cuprate Pr_{1-x}LaCe_{x}CuO_{4-δ} (PLCCO). It is found that the optimal annealing condition is dependent on the Ce content x. The electron number (n) is estimated from the experimentally obtained Fermi surface volume for x=0.10, 0.15 and 0.18 samples. It clearly shows a significant and annealing dependent deviation from the nominal x. In addition, we observe that the pseudo-gap at hot spots is also closely correlated with n; the pseudogap gradually closes as n increases. We established a new phase diagram of PLCCO as a function of n. Different from the x-based one, the new phase diagram shows similar antiferromagnetic and superconducting phases to those of hole doped ones. Our results raise a possibility for absence of disparity between the phase diagrams of electron- and hole-doped cuprates.