A Prospective Study of the Reliability and Validity of the Live Donor Assessment Tool

Background: The psychosocial evaluation is an important part of the live organ donor evaluation process, yet this is not standardized across institutions.

Objective: This study was designed to prospectively test the reliability and validity of a semistructured psychosocial evaluation tool that was recently developed and reported in the literature (the Live Donor Assessment Tool [LDAT]).

Methods: A total of 248 live donor candidates who presented for evaluation were invited to participate in a study that involved the LDAT being scored as part of the standard psychosocial evaluation process; 222 provided informed consent. Evaluations were conducted by staff experienced with psychosocial evaluation of living donors and trained in the use of the LDAT. Furthermore, 123 donor candidates were evaluated twice, as per routine standard of care, and had 2 LDATs administered. Reliability of the LDAT was assessed by calculating the internal consistency of the LDAT items and inter-rater reliability. Validity was assessed by comparing LDAT scores across the risk-group categories (the traditional outcome designation of the psychosocial evaluation) and in 86 eventual donors, associations between LDAT scores, and indicators of psychosocial outcomes post-donation.

Results: The LDAT was found to have good internal consistency, strong inter-rater reliability, and showed signs of validity: LDAT scores differentiated the traditional risk-group categories, and a significant association between LDAT score and treatment adherence post-donation was revealed.

Conclusions: The LDAT demonstrated good reliability and validity, but future research on the LDAT and the ability to implement the LDAT across institutions is warranted.