Comparison of Outcomes with Tissue Expander, Immediate Implant, and Autologous Breast Reconstruction in Greater Than 1000 Nipple-Sparing Mastectomies

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Jun;139(6):1300-1310. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003340.

Abstract

Background: Nipple-sparing mastectomy permits complete preservation of the nipple-areola complex with excellent aesthetic results and with oncologic safety similar to that associated with traditional mastectomy techniques. However, outcomes have not been directly compared for tissue expander-, immediate implant-, and autologous tissue-based breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Methods: All patients undergoing nipple-sparing mastectomy from 2006 to June of 2016 were identified at a single institution. Demographics and outcomes were analyzed and compared among different types of breast reconstruction.

Results: A total of 1028 nipple-sparing mastectomies were performed. Of these, 533 (51.8 percent) were tissue expander-based, 263 (25.6 percent) were autologous tissue-based, and 232 (22.6 percent) were immediate implant-based reconstructions. Tissue expander-based reconstructions had significantly more minor cellulitis (p = 0.0002) but less complete nipple necrosis (p = 0.0126) and major mastectomy flap necrosis (p < 0.0001) compared with autologous tissue-based reconstructions. Compared to immediate implant-based reconstruction, tissue expander-based reconstructions had significantly more minor cellulitis (p = 0.0006) but less complete nipple necrosis (p = 0.0005) and major (p < 0.0001) and minor (p = 0.0028) mastectomy flap necrosis (p = 0.0059). Immediate implant-based reconstructions had significantly more minor cellulitis (p = 0.0051), minor mastectomy flap necrosis (p = 0.0425), and partial nipple necrosis (p = 0.0437) compared with autologous tissue-based reconstructions. Outcomes were otherwise equivalent among the three groups.

Conclusions: Tissue expander, immediate implant, and autologous tissue breast reconstruction techniques may all be safely offered with nipple-sparing mastectomy. However, reconstructive complications appear to be greater with immediate implant- and autologous tissue-based techniques compared with tissue expander-based reconstruction.

Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, III.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Breast Implants*
  • Breast Neoplasms / mortality
  • Breast Neoplasms / pathology
  • Breast Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Cohort Studies
  • Databases, Factual
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Esthetics
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Graft Survival
  • Humans
  • Logistic Models
  • Mammaplasty / methods*
  • Mastectomy, Subcutaneous / methods*
  • Middle Aged
  • Nipples
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Assessment
  • Survival Analysis
  • Tissue Expansion Devices*
  • Transplantation, Autologous / methods
  • Treatment Outcome