Quantitating morphological changes in biological samples during scanning electron microscopy sample preparation with correlative super-resolution microscopy

PLoS One. 2017 May 31;12(5):e0176839. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176839. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Sample preparation is critical to biological electron microscopy (EM), and there have been continuous efforts on optimizing the procedures to best preserve structures of interest in the sample. However, a quantitative characterization of the morphological changes associated with each step in EM sample preparation is currently lacking. Using correlative EM and superresolution microscopy (SRM), we have examined the effects of different drying methods as well as osmium tetroxide (OsO4) post-fixation on cell morphology during scanning electron microscopy (SEM) sample preparation. Here, SRM images of the sample acquired under hydrated conditions were used as a baseline for evaluating morphological changes as the sample went through SEM sample processing. We found that both chemical drying and critical point drying lead to a mild cellular boundary retraction of ~60 nm. Post-fixation by OsO4 causes at least 40 nm additional boundary retraction. We also found that coating coverslips with adhesion molecules such as fibronectin prior to cell plating helps reduce cell distortion from OsO4 post-fixation. These quantitative measurements offer useful information for identifying causes of cell distortions in SEM sample preparation and improving current procedures.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Cell Line
  • Cloning, Molecular
  • Microscopy, Electron, Scanning / methods*
  • Specimen Handling*

Grants and funding

XN and JWG acknowledge the financial support from the Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation, the FEI company, and the M.J. Murdock Charitable Trust, the Prospect Creek Foundation, and the OHSU Knight Cancer Institute. JWG was supported by the Office of Science and the Office of Biological and Environmental Research, both of the U.S. Department of Energy, under Contract DE-AC02-05CH11231, and by the W. M. Keck Foundation, and by the Department of the Army Award W81XWH-07-1-0663. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.