Economic Evaluation of Complete Revascularization for Patients with Multivessel Disease Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Value Health. 2017 Jun;20(6):745-751. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Mar 22.

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the cost-effectiveness of complete revascularization at index admission compared with infarct-related artery (IRA) treatment only, in patients with multivessel disease undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (P-PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Methods: An economic evaluation of a multicenter randomized trial was conducted, comparing complete revascularization at index admission to IRA-only P-PCI in patients with multivessel disease (12-month follow-up). Overall hospital costs (costs for P-PCI procedure(s), hospital length of stay, and any subsequent re-admissions) were estimated. Outcomes were major adverse cardiac events (MACEs, a composite of all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, heart failure, and ischemia-driven revascularization) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) derived from the three-level EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire. Multiple imputation was undertaken. The mean incremental cost and effect, with associated 95% confidence intervals, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, and the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve were estimated.

Results: On the basis of 296 patients, the mean incremental overall hospital cost for complete revascularization was estimated to be -£215.96 (-£1390.20 to £958.29), compared with IRA-only, with a per-patient mean reduction in MACEs of 0.170 (0.044 to 0.296) and a QALY gain of 0.011 (-0.019 to 0.041). According to the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve, the probability of complete revascularization being cost-effective was estimated to be 72.0% at a willingness-to-pay threshold value of £20,000 per QALY.

Conclusions: Complete revascularization at index admission was estimated to be more effective (in terms of MACEs and QALYs) and cost-effective (overall costs were estimated to be lower and complete revascularization thereby dominated IRA-only). There was, however, some uncertainty associated with this decision.

Keywords: economic evaluation; myocardial infarction; percutaneous coronary intervention; revascularization.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Coronary Artery Disease / economics
  • Coronary Artery Disease / pathology
  • Coronary Artery Disease / surgery*
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Hospital Costs / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans
  • Length of Stay
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Myocardial Revascularization / economics
  • Myocardial Revascularization / methods*
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention / economics
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention / methods*
  • Probability
  • Quality-Adjusted Life Years
  • ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction / economics
  • ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction / pathology
  • ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction / surgery*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires