Modular minimal invasive extracorporeal circuits: another step toward universal applicability?

Perfusion. 2017 Oct;32(7):598-605. doi: 10.1177/0267659117712404. Epub 2017 Jun 3.

Abstract

Introduction: Safety concerns have been one of the main reasons opposing a wider acceptance of minimal invasive extracorporeal circuits (MiECC). Following an extensive experience and a multitude of modifications, we have set out to employ a modular MiECC as a universal extracorporeal circuit.

Methods: A total of 129 cardiac surgical procedures were performed by a single surgeon in 2013. Excluding procedures done under circulatory arrest or with the potential need of such, the MiECC was utilized in almost 90% of surgeries. Of sixty-two (simple procedures) patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), aortic valve replacement (AVR) or CABG + AVR, 82% were non-elective, 10% had a left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) <30% and most had an impaired renal function. Thirty-eight patients had more complex surgeries (complex procedures), 37% of which were urgent, 15% had an EF <30% and the majority had renal dysfunction.

Results: The 30-day mortality was 5% in simple procedures and 2.5% in complex procedures. The incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation was 13% and 16%, respectively. Optimum outcome was defined as a freedom from all complications and blood transfusions and was achieved in 52% and 42%, respectively.

Conclusions: This report shows that modular MiECC can be employed with a high safety margin in cardiac surgery. Furthermore, it emphasizes the impact that minimal invasive philosophy could have in improving patient care.

Keywords: atrial fibrillation; minimal invasive extracorporeal circuits; modular nature; optimum outcome; transfusion requirements.

Publication types

  • Case Reports

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Coronary Artery Bypass / methods*
  • Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation / methods*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Treatment Outcome