Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate at 1.5 versus 3.0T: A prospective comparison study of image quality

Eur J Radiol. 2017 May:90:192-197. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.02.044. Epub 2017 Mar 4.

Abstract

Objectives: This study prospectively evaluates objective image quality (IQ), subjective IQ, and PI-RADS scoring of prostate MRI at 3.0T (3T) and 1.5T (1.5T) within the same patients.

Methods: Sixty-three consecutive patients (64±9years) were prospectively included in this non-inferiority trial, powered at 80% to demonstrate a ≤10% difference in signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging (T2WI, DWI) at 1.5T compared to 3T. Secondary endpoints were analysis of subjective IQ and PI-RADS v2 scoring.

Results: All patients received multi-parametric prostate MRI on a 3T (T2WI, DWI, DCE) and bi-parametric MRI (T2WI, DWI) on a 1.5T scanner using body coils, respectively. SNR and CNR of T2WI were similar at 1.5T and 3T (p=0.7-1), but of DWI significantly lower at 1.5T (p<0.01). Subjective IQ was significantly better at 3T for both, T2WI and DWI (p<0.01). PI-RADS scores were comparable for both field strengths (p=0.05-1). Inter-reader agreement was excellent for subjective IQ assessment and PI-RADS scoring (k=0.9-1).

Conclusion: Prostate MRI at 1.5T can reveal comparable objective image quality in T2WI, but is inferior to 3T in DWI and subjective IQ. However, similar PI-RADS scoring and thus diagnostic performance seems feasible independent of the field strength even without an endorectal coil.

Keywords: Image quality; Magnetic field strength; Prostate MRI; Prostate cancer.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Humans
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies
  • Prostate / diagnostic imaging*
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging*