Cryoablation for Atrial Fibrillation in 2017: What Have We Learned?

Padmanabhan Shakkottai; Raymond W Sy; Mark A McGuire

doi:10.1016/j.hlc.2017.05.115

Cryoablation for Atrial Fibrillation in 2017: What Have We Learned?

Heart Lung Circ. 2017 Sep;26(9):950-959. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2017.05.115. Epub 2017 May 26.

Authors

Padmanabhan Shakkottai¹, Raymond W Sy², Mark A McGuire³

Affiliations

¹ Department of Cardiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
² Department of Cardiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
³ Department of Cardiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Electronic address: [email protected].

PMID: 28652028
DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2017.05.115

Abstract

Catheter ablation has become a standard technique for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the most important component of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Radiofrequency (RF) ablation and balloon cryoablation can be used to achieve PVI. This review examines the biophysics and clinical efficacy of balloon cryoablation and discusses the potential advantages and disadvantages compared to RF ablation.

Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Cryoballoon; Pulmonary Vein Isolation.

Copyright © 2017 Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Publication types

Review

MeSH terms

Atrial Fibrillation / surgery*
Cryosurgery / methods*
Heart Conduction System / surgery*
Humans
Treatment Outcome