Paper vs. Pixel: Can We Use a Pen-and-Paper Method to Measure Athletes' Implicit Doping Attitude?

Derwin K C Chan; Alfred S Y Lee; Tracy C W Tang; Daniel F Gucciardi; Patrick S H Yung; Martin S Hagger

doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00876

Paper vs. Pixel: Can We Use a Pen-and-Paper Method to Measure Athletes' Implicit Doping Attitude?

Front Psychol. 2017 Jun 12:8:876. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00876. eCollection 2017.

Authors

Derwin K C Chan^{1

2}, Alfred S Y Lee¹, Tracy C W Tang¹, Daniel F Gucciardi³, Patrick S H Yung⁴, Martin S Hagger^{2

5

6}

Affiliations

¹ School of Public Health, University of Hong KongPokfulam, Hong Kong.
² Health Psychology and Behavioural Medicine, School of Psychology and Speech Pathology, Curtin UniversityPerth, WA, Australia.
³ School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin UniversityPerth, WA, Australia.
⁴ Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Chinese University of Hong KongShatin, Hong Kong.
⁵ Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of JyväskyläJyväskylä, Finland.
⁶ Department of Physical Education, Hong Kong Baptist UniversityHong Kong, Hong Kong.

No abstract available

Keywords: automatic awareness to doping; banned performance-enhancing substances; implicit association test; paper-and-pen IAT; prohibited drugs in sport.