Bolus Advisors: Sources of Error, Targets for Improvement

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Jan;12(1):190-198. doi: 10.1177/1932296817718213. Epub 2017 Jul 25.

Abstract

Bolus advisors that are designed to improve the accuracy of individual bolus doses relative to a meal's carb content and the current glucose have not substantially changed since they were introduced 15 years ago despite an obvious need for enhancement and innovation. Although some glycemic benefits have been demonstrated, bolus advisors largely ignore the large amounts of clinical data they gather that could have a significant impact on glucose outcomes. Concerns have also been raised regarding the aggressive nature of largely unpublished or poorly explained bolus advisor algorithms. Hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia remain significant risks due to inaccurate bolus advisor settings and the absence of tracking or an inappropriate handling of bolus on board. This review covers common sources for bolus advisor error such as the selection of physiologically inappropriate bolus advisor settings, the use of short duration of insulin action times, poor algorithm logic that tends to cover all carb intake fully, and an excessive reliance on simplistic dosing algorithms. As well as discussing these areas, we provide 21 ways to improve current bolus calculators.

Keywords: bolus advisors; bolus calculators; diabetes; insulin pumps; insulin stacking; insulin therapy; prandial insulin dosing; pump settings.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Algorithms
  • Diabetes Mellitus / drug therapy*
  • Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
  • Humans
  • Hypoglycemic Agents / administration & dosage*
  • Hypoglycemic Agents / therapeutic use
  • Insulin / administration & dosage*
  • Insulin / therapeutic use

Substances

  • Hypoglycemic Agents
  • Insulin