Background: We investigated whether variation in post-acute care (PAC) services could be explained by surgeons discharging clinically similar patients to different PAC destinations, including home health (HH), skilled nursing facilities (SNF), and inpatient rehabilitation (IR).
Methods: We studied patients having colectomy, pancreatectomy or hepatectomy in the 2008-2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. We used propensity matching to determine: 1. Proportion of patients discharged to SNF/IR who could be matched to clinically similar patients discharged with HH. 2. Potential cost savings from greater use of HH.
Results: 30,843 patients were discharged with HH and 23,172 to SNF or IR. 14,163 (61%) SNF/IR patients could be matched to similar patients discharged with HH. Potential cost savings from increasing use of HH as an alternative to SNF/IR ranged from $2.5-$438 million annually.
Conclusions: There is considerable potential for reducing variation in PAC use and costs by better understanding how surgeons make decisions about PAC placement.
Keywords: Care transitions; Cost-effectiveness; Post-acute care; Post-discharge care; Postoperative recovery.
Published by Elsevier Inc.