Cost-effectiveness of a risk-stratified approach to cardiac resynchronisation therapy defibrillators (high versus low) at the time of generator change

Heart. 2018 Mar;104(5):416-422. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311749. Epub 2017 Sep 29.

Abstract

Objective: Responders to cardiac resynchronisation therapy whose device has a defibrillator component and who do not receive a therapy in the lifetime of the first generator have a very low incidence of appropriate therapy after box change. We investigated the cost implications of using a risk stratification tool at the time of generator change resulting in these patients being reimplanted with a resynchronisation pacemaker.

Methods: A decision tree was created using previously published data which had demonstrated an annualised appropriate defibrillator therapy risk of 2.33%. Costs were calculated at National Health Service (NHS) national tariff rates (2016-2017). EQ-5D utility values were applied to device reimplantations, admissions and mortality data, which were then used to estimate quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) over 5 years.

Results: At 5 years, the incremental cost of replacing a resynchronisation defibrillator device with a second resynchronisation defibrillator versus resynchronisation pacemaker was £5045 per patient. Incremental QALY gained was 0.0165 (defibrillator vs pacemaker), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £305 712 per QALYs gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis resulted in an ICER of £313 612 (defibrillator vs pacemaker). For reimplantation of all patients with a defibrillator rather than a pacemaker to yield an ICER of less than £30 000 per QALY gained (current NHS cut-off for approval of treatment), the annual arrhythmic event rate would need to be 9.3%. The budget impact of selective replacement was a saving of £2 133 985 per year.

Conclusions: Implanting low-risk patients with a resynchronisation defibrillator with the same device at the time of generator change is not cost-effective by current NHS criteria. Further research is required to understand the impact of these findings on individual patients at the time of generator change.

Keywords: Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy; Cost effectiveness; Defibrillator.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy / adverse effects
  • Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy / economics*
  • Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices / adverse effects
  • Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices / economics*
  • Clinical Decision-Making
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Decision Support Techniques
  • Decision Trees
  • Defibrillators, Implantable / adverse effects
  • Defibrillators, Implantable / economics*
  • Device Removal / economics
  • Electric Countershock / adverse effects
  • Electric Countershock / economics*
  • Electric Countershock / instrumentation
  • Electric Power Supplies / adverse effects
  • Electric Power Supplies / economics*
  • Equipment Design
  • Equipment Failure
  • Female
  • Health Care Costs*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Quality-Adjusted Life Years
  • Recovery of Function
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Factors
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Ventricular Dysfunction, Left / diagnosis
  • Ventricular Dysfunction, Left / economics*
  • Ventricular Dysfunction, Left / physiopathology
  • Ventricular Dysfunction, Left / therapy*
  • Ventricular Function, Left