Variation in adherence to medications across the healthcare system in two comparative effectiveness research cohorts

J Comp Eff Res. 2017 Oct;6(7):613-625. doi: 10.2217/cer-2016-0095. Epub 2017 Oct 17.

Abstract

Aim: To assess heterogeneity in adherence to medications in two example comparative effectiveness research studies.

Patients & methods: We analyzed data from commercially insured patients initiating a statin or anticoagulant during 2005-2012. We calculated the cross-validated R2 from a series of hierarchical linear models to assess variation in 1-year adherence.

Results: There was less heterogeneity in adherence in the statin cohort compared with the anticoagulant cohort, where patient characteristics explained 7.2% of variation in adherence, and adding therapy and provider characteristics increased the proportion of variation explained to 8.0 and 8.5%, cumulatively. Random effects provided essentially no explanatory power, even in the statin cohort with large numbers of patients clustered within each pharmacy, prescriber and provider.

Conclusion: The dependence of adherence on the healthcare system was stronger when the healthcare system influenced treatment choice and patient access to medication and when indications for treatment were strong.

Keywords: adherence; comparative effectiveness research; mixed models.

MeSH terms

  • Anticoagulants / therapeutic use*
  • Atrial Fibrillation / drug therapy
  • Cohort Studies
  • Comparative Effectiveness Research
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors / therapeutic use*
  • Male
  • Medication Adherence*
  • Middle Aged
  • Pharmaceutical Services / statistics & numerical data
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Anticoagulants
  • Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors