Are We Underestimating Microplastic Contamination in Aquatic Environments?

Environ Manage. 2018 Jan;61(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0947-8. Epub 2017 Oct 17.

Abstract

Plastic debris, specifically microplastic in the aquatic environment, is an escalating environmental crisis. Efforts at national scales to reduce or ban microplastics in personal care products are starting to pay off, but this will not affect those materials already in the environment or those that result from unregulated products and materials. To better inform future microplastic research and mitigation efforts this study (1) evaluates methods currently used to quantify microplastics in the environment and (2) characterizes the concentration and size distribution of microplastics in a variety of products. In this study, 50 published aquatic surveys were reviewed and they demonstrated that most (~80%) only account for plastics ≥ 300 μm in diameter. In addition, we surveyed 770 personal care products to determine the occurrence, concentration and size distribution of polyethylene microbeads. Particle concentrations ranged from 1.9 to 71.9 mg g-1 of product or 1649 to 31,266 particles g-1 of product. The large majority ( > 95%) of particles in products surveyed were less than the 300 μm minimum diameter, indicating that previous environmental surveys could be underestimating microplastic contamination. To account for smaller particles as well as microfibers from synthetic textiles, we strongly recommend that future surveys consider methods that materials < 300 μm in diameter.

Keywords: Aquatic environments; Environmental loading; Oceans; Plastic debris; Polyethylene microbeads.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Environmental Monitoring
  • Plastics / analysis*
  • Water Pollutants, Chemical / analysis*
  • Water Pollution, Chemical / analysis

Substances

  • Plastics
  • Water Pollutants, Chemical