Image-guided percutaneous management of duodenal perforation following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): assessment of efficacy and safety

Clin Radiol. 2018 Mar;73(3):319.e9-319.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.09.014. Epub 2017 Oct 31.

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of image-guided percutaneous drain placement for duodenal perforation following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

Materials and methods: A retrospective review of 7,249 ERCP examinations over a 10-year period was performed to identify cases of duodenal perforation. Indications for ERCP were documented, along with the clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings following perforation. Technical and clinical success of percutaneous drain placement was reviewed.

Results: Duodenal perforation occurred in 35 of 7,249 patients during the study period. Management included primary surgical debridement (n=2), conservative management consisting of bowel rest, nasogastric/nasojejunal tube placement (n=20), and percutaneous catheter drainage (n=13). Twenty-seven percutaneous drainage catheters were placed in 13 patients, with a mean duration of catheter drainage of 30.9 days (range 4-108 days). Ten patients were successfully treated with percutaneous management alone, and three required subsequent surgical intervention.

Conclusion: Percutaneous management of duodenal perforation related to ERCP is associated with high technical and clinical success, and may obviate the need for surgical intervention.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde / adverse effects*
  • Conservative Treatment
  • Debridement
  • Drainage
  • Duodenum / injuries*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Iatrogenic Disease
  • Intestinal Perforation / diagnostic imaging*
  • Intestinal Perforation / etiology*
  • Intestinal Perforation / therapy*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Radiography, Interventional*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome