Substance P signalling in primary motor cortex facilitates motor learning in rats

PLoS One. 2017 Dec 27;12(12):e0189812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189812. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Among the genes that are up-regulated in response to a reaching training in rats, Tachykinin 1 (Tac1)-a gene that encodes the neuropeptide Substance P (Sub P)-shows an especially strong expression. Using Real-Time RT-PCR, a detailed time-course of Tac1 expression could be defined: a significant peak occurs 7 hours after training ended at the first and second training session, whereas no up-regulation could be detected at a later time-point (sixth training session). To assess the physiological role of Sub P during movement acquisition, microinjections into the primary motor cortex (M1) contralateral to the trained paw were performed. When Sub P was injected before the first three sessions of a reaching training, effectiveness of motor learning became significantly increased. Injections at a time-point when rats already knew the task (i.e. training session ten and eleven) had no effect on reaching performance. Sub P injections did not influence the improvement of performance within a single training session, but retention of performance between sessions became strengthened at a very early stage (i.e. between baseline-training and first training session). Thus, Sub P facilitates motor learning in the very early phase of skill acquisition by supporting memory consolidation. In line with these findings, learning related expression of the precursor Tac1 occurs at early but not at later time-points during reaching training.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Learning*
  • Male
  • Motor Cortex / metabolism*
  • Motor Skills*
  • Rats
  • Rats, Long-Evans
  • Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
  • Signal Transduction*
  • Substance P / metabolism*

Substances

  • Substance P

Grants and funding

Funding came from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF, NCCR Neuro) and the P & K Pühringer Foundation. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.