Background: We retrospectively analyzed data from 310 patients with acute myeloid leukemia with intermediate-risk cytogenetics in first complete remission (CR1) to evaluate the usage and efficacy of various types of postremission therapy.
Patients and methods: Cox regression with time-dependent covariates, landmark analysis, and competing risk models were used to estimate the outcomes and effects of treatment and patient- and disease-related risk factors.
Results: The early relapse rate and early nonrelapse mortality (NRM) were 12.8% and 4.4%, respectively. In our study, 77.2% of patients completed postremission therapy: 44% received allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), 20% completed treatment with high-dose cytarabine (HIDAC), and 13% completed treatment with intermediate-dose cytarabine. The 3-year overall survival rate was 67.5% for patients treated with HIDAC and 63.4% after HCT (P = .5876). The NRM and relapse rate at 3 years were 0% and 58.9% after HIDAC and 21.9% and 29.3% after HCT, respectively. HCT reduced the risk of relapse (hazard ratio, 0.6; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.98). Total body irradiation-based myeloablative conditioning increased NRM compared with busulfan-based conditioning (hazard ratio, 8.33; 95% confidence interval, 2.52-27.45).
Conclusion: Most patients with acute myeloid leukemia with intermediate-risk cytogenetics received allogeneic HCT, which decreased the risk of relapse but increased NRM, leading to a similar overall survival for patients who received HCT and HIDAC. Our data support the use of allogeneic transplantation for patients in CR1 from a human leukocyte antigen-matched related or unrelated donor after a busulfan-based myeloablative conditioning regimen as a primary strategy of postremission therapy for eligible younger patients.
Keywords: Acute myeloid leukemia; Chemotherapy; Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.