Diagnostic Accuracy of the Veteran Affairs' Traumatic Brain Injury Screen

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Jul;99(7):1370-1382. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.11.017. Epub 2018 Jan 31.

Abstract

Objective: To comprehensively estimate the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Clinical Reminder Screen (TCRS).

Design: Cross-sectional, prospective, observational study using the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy criteria.

Setting: Three VA Polytrauma Network Sites.

Participants: Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation Enduring Freedom veterans (N=433).

Main outcome measures: TCRS, Comprehensive TBI Evaluation, Structured TBI Diagnostic Interview, Symptom Attribution and Classification Algorithm, and Clinician-Administered Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Scale.

Results: Forty-five percent of veterans screened positive on the TCRS for TBI. For detecting occurrence of historical TBI, the TCRS had a sensitivity of .56 to .74, a specificity of .63 to .93, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 25% to 45%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 91% to 94%, and a diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 4 to 13. For accuracy of attributing active symptoms to the TBI, the TCRS had a sensitivity of .64 to .87, a specificity of .59 to .89, a PPV of 26% to 32%, an NPV of 92% to 95%, and a DOR of 6 to 9. The sensitivity was higher for veterans with PTSD (.80-.86) relative to veterans without PTSD (.57-.82). The specificity, however, was higher among veterans without PTSD (.75-.81) relative to veterans with PTSD (.36-.49). All indices of diagnostic accuracy changed when participants with questionably valid (QV) test profiles were eliminated from analyses.

Conclusions: The utility of the TCRS to screen for mild TBI (mTBI) depends on the stringency of the diagnostic reference standard to which it is being compared, the presence/absence of PTSD, and QV test profiles. Further development, validation, and use of reproducible diagnostic algorithms for symptom attribution after possible mTBI would improve diagnostic accuracy.

Keywords: Brain injuries, traumatic; Mass screening; Rehabilitation; Sensitivity and specificity; Veterans.

Publication types

  • Observational Study
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Afghan Campaign 2001-
  • Algorithms*
  • Brain Concussion / diagnosis*
  • Brain Concussion / psychology
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Iraq War, 2003-2011
  • Male
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Prospective Studies
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic / etiology
  • Symptom Assessment / methods
  • Symptom Assessment / statistics & numerical data*
  • United States
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs