Burden of cardiovascular disease across 29 countries and GPs' decision to treat hypertension in oldest-old

Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018 Mar;36(1):89-98. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2018.1426142. Epub 2018 Jan 25.

Abstract

Objectives: We previously found large variations in general practitioner (GP) hypertension treatment probability in oldest-old (>80 years) between countries. We wanted to explore whether differences in country-specific cardiovascular disease (CVD) burden and life expectancy could explain the differences.

Design: This is a survey study using case-vignettes of oldest-old patients with different comorbidities and blood pressure levels. An ecological multilevel model analysis was performed.

Setting: GP respondents from European General Practice Research Network (EGPRN) countries, Brazil and New Zeeland.

Subjects: This study included 2543 GPs from 29 countries.

Main outcome measures: GP treatment probability to start or not start antihypertensive treatment based on responses to case-vignettes; either low (<50% started treatment) or high (≥50% started treatment). CVD burden is defined as ratio of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) lost due to ischemic heart disease and/or stroke and total DALYs lost per country; life expectancy at age 60 and prevalence of oldest-old per country.

Results: Of 1947 GPs (76%) responding to all vignettes, 787 (40%) scored high treatment probability and 1160 (60%) scored low. GPs in high CVD burden countries had higher odds of treatment probability (OR 3.70; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.00-4.57); in countries with low life expectancy at 60, CVD was associated with high treatment probability (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.12-4.25); but not in countries with high life expectancy (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.56-1.98).

Conclusions: GPs' choice to treat/not treat hypertension in oldest-old was explained by differences in country-specific health characteristics. GPs in countries with high CVD burden and low life expectancy at age 60 were most likely to treat hypertension in oldest-old. Key Points • General practitioners (GPs) are in a clinical dilemma when deciding whether (or not) to treat hypertension in the oldest-old (>80 years of age). • In this study including 1947 GPs from 29 countries, we found that a high country-specific cardiovascular disease (CVD) burden (i.e. myocardial infarction and/or stroke) was associated with a higher GP treatment probability in patients aged >80 years. • However, the association was modified by country-specific life expectancy at age 60. While there was a positive association for GPs in countries with a low life expectancy at age 60, there was no association in countries with a high life expectancy at age 60. • These findings help explaining some of the large variation seen in the decision as to whether or not to treat hypertension in the oldest-old.

Keywords: Oldest-old; cardiovascular disease burden; clinical decision-making; hypertension; life expectancy.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Age Factors
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Antihypertensive Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Blood Pressure
  • Brazil / epidemiology
  • Cardiovascular Diseases / epidemiology*
  • Comorbidity
  • Cross-Cultural Comparison
  • Decision Making*
  • Demography
  • Europe / epidemiology
  • Female
  • General Practice
  • General Practitioners*
  • Humans
  • Hypertension / drug therapy*
  • Life Expectancy*
  • Male
  • Myocardial Ischemia / epidemiology
  • New Zealand / epidemiology
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians'*
  • Quality-Adjusted Life Years
  • Stroke / epidemiology
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Substances

  • Antihypertensive Agents