Could electrohysterography be the solution for external uterine monitoring in obese women?

J Perinatol. 2018 May;38(5):580-586. doi: 10.1038/s41372-018-0065-3. Epub 2018 Feb 21.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the influence of maternal obesity on the performance of external tocodynamometry and electrohysterography.

Study design: In a 2-hour measurement during term labor, uterine contractions were simultaneously measured by electrohysterography, external tocodynamometry, and intra-uterine pressure catheter. The sensitivity was compared between groups based on obesity (non-obese/obese/morbidly obese) or uterine palpation (good/moderate/poor), and was correlated to maternal BMI and abdominal circumference.

Result: We included 14 morbidly obese, 18 obese, and 20 non-obese women. In morbidly obese women, the median sensitivity was 87.2% (IQR 74-93) by electrohysterography and 45.0% (IQR 36-66) by external tocodynamometry (p < 0.001). The sensitivity of electrohysterography appeared to be non-influenced by obesity category (p = 0.279) and uterine palpation (p = 0.451), while the sensitivity of tocodynamometry decreased significantly (p = 0.005 and p < 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, the sensitivity of both external methods was negatively correlated with obesity parameters, being non-significant for electrohysterography (range p-values 0.057-0.088) and significant for external tocodynamometry (all p-values < 0.001).

Conclusions: Electrohysterography performs significantly better than external tocodynamometry in case of maternal obesity.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Electromyography / methods*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Labor, Obstetric / physiology*
  • Linear Models
  • Monitoring, Physiologic / methods*
  • Obesity / complications
  • Obesity, Morbid / complications*
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Pregnancy
  • Prospective Studies
  • Uterine Contraction / physiology
  • Uterine Monitoring
  • Uterus / physiology*