Should 18F-FDG PET/CT Be Routinely Performed in the Clinical Staging of Locally Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma?

Clin Nucl Med. 2018 Jun;43(6):402-410. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000002028.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate F-FDG PET/CT compared with conventional imaging techniques in the clinical management of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC).

Methods: A prospective study between January 2010 and December 2011 in patients with suspected LAGC was conducted in our hospital. F-FDG PET/CT, contrast-enhanced CT (CECT), endoscopic ultrasound, and laparoscopy were performed in all cases. Standard whole-body F-FDG PET/CT images were obtained centered on the stomach at 1 and 2 hours after injection of 4.0 MBq/kg of F-FDG. Findings were confirmed by histopathology or by imaging follow-up in nonoperable patients.

Results: Fifty consecutive patients with confirmed LAGC (20 women, 30 men) with a mean ± SD age of 65.7 ± 12.1 years were included. Using Lauren classification, 24 patients were intestinal subtype, and 26 were diffuse subtype. Thirty-five patients with locoregional lymph node involvement and 22 with distant metastases were confirmed as peritoneal metastases (n = 15), retroperitoneal (n = 2) or mediastinal lymph nodes (n = 1), and liver (n = 3) or bone metastases (n = 1). Patients with signet ring carcinoma showed significantly less F-FDG uptake (P = 0.001). SUVmax correlated with tumor grading (P < 0.05). Standard and delayed F-FDG PET/CT and CECT images identified LAGC in 24, 27, and 28 of 30 patients, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for F-FDG PET/CT and CECT to detect metastases were 68% and 100% and 64% and 93%, respectively. Contrast-enhanced CT and F-FDG PET/CT diagnosed only 6 of the 15 patients with confirmed peritoneal metastases. The impact in therapeutic management of F-FDG PET/CT and CECT was 24% and 22%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for the LGAC showed a significant correlation between SUVmax and overall survival using an SUVmax threshold of less than 3.96 (P = 0.04).

Conclusions: F-FDG PET/CT should be recommended for staging of LAGC; however, F-FDG PET/CT and CECT cannot replace laparoscopy to rule out peritoneal metastases. Delayed F-FDG PET/CT images show an increase of F-FDG uptake in most cases, improving LAGC detection. The grade of F-FDG uptake represents a significant prognostic tool in this series.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adenocarcinoma / diagnostic imaging*
  • Adenocarcinoma / pathology
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Female
  • Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography / methods
  • Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography / standards*
  • Radiopharmaceuticals
  • Stomach Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging*
  • Stomach Neoplasms / pathology

Substances

  • Radiopharmaceuticals
  • Fluorodeoxyglucose F18