Introduction and objectives: The incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) and new conduction abnormalities (CA) with the ACURATE neo (Symetis S.A., Eclubens, Switzerland) has not been studied in detail. We aimed to analyze their predictors, evaluating patient- and device-related factors, including implantation depth and device-to-annulus ratio (DAR).
Methods: Two analyses of a multicenter population were performed: new PPI in pacemaker-naive patients (n = 283), and PPI/new-CA in patients without prior CA or pacemaker (n = 232).
Results: A new PPI was required in 9.9% of patients, who had a higher body mass index, higher rate of right bundle branch block and bradycardia. Neither implantation depth nor DAR differed in patients with PPI compared with those without. In the multivariable analysis neither DAR (OR, 1.010; 95%CI, 0.967-1.055; P = .7) nor implantation depth (OR, 0.972; 95%CI, 0.743-1.272; P = .8) predicted PPI. Only high body mass index, bradycardia and right bundle branch block persisted as independent predictors. PPI/new-onset CA occurred in 22.8% of patients and was associated with a higher logistic EuroSCORE. Neither implantation depth nor DAR differed in patients with PPI/new-CA vs those without (7.3 ± 1.9 vs 7.1 ± 1.5mm; P = .6 and 41.0 ± 7.9 vs 42.2 ± 10.1%; P = .4). The only predictor of PPI/new-CA was a higher logistic EuroSCORE (OR, 1.039; 95%CI, [1.008-1.071]; P = .013).
Conclusions: New PPI and new-onset CA rates were low with the ACURATE neo. These were mainly influenced by patient characteristics and not by device-depending factors.
Keywords: Alteraciones de la conducción; Conduction abnormalities; Implante de marcapasos permanente; Implante percutáneo de válvula aórtica; Permanent pacemaker implantation; Predictores; Predictors; Transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Copyright © 2018 Sociedad Española de Cardiología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.