Retrospective Comparison of Single-Port Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Three-Port Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Propensity Score Adjustment Analysis

Obes Surg. 2018 Jul;28(7):2105-2112. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3244-6.

Abstract

Purpose: Evaluate the efficacy of single-port sleeve gastrectomy (SPSG) and then compare it to a less-invasive sleeve approach (three-port) (3PSG) according to a propensity score (PS) matching analysis.

Materials and methods: We analyzed all patients who underwent SG through a three-port or a single-port laparoscopic approach.

Results: After 2 years, the follow-up was completed in 84% patients treated with 3PSG and 95% patients of the SPSG group. Excess weight loss (EWL) was comparable for the first year of follow-up within the two groups except for the controls at 3 months in which the SPSG group showed a higher EWL (p = 0.0243).

Conclusion: We demonstrated the efficacy of SPSG in bariatric surgery even compared to another, less invasive, laparoscopic SG approach (three-port).

Keywords: Excess weight loss; Port conventional laparoscopic; Propensity score adjustment analysis; Single port; Sleeve gastrectomy.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Bariatric Surgery / adverse effects
  • Bariatric Surgery / methods
  • Bariatric Surgery / statistics & numerical data
  • Case-Control Studies
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Gastrectomy / adverse effects
  • Gastrectomy / methods*
  • Gastrectomy / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy / adverse effects
  • Laparoscopy / methods*
  • Laparoscopy / statistics & numerical data
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Obesity, Morbid / epidemiology*
  • Obesity, Morbid / surgery*
  • Propensity Score
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Weight Loss