Objective: To evaluate the outcome of patients undergoing PCI for unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease with different drug-eluting stent (DES) types.
Background: Published literature suggests that second-generation DES options have differing vascular responses and outcomes, but there is a paucity of data in real-life patients in the LM setting.
Methods: This is a retrospective, multicenter study, including patients treated with a second-generation DES for ULMCA disease between 2007 and 2015. The primary endpoint was target-lesion revascularization (TLR). Secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiac events, myocardial infarction (MI), and stent thrombosis (ST).
Results: A total of 1209 patients were enrolled; 840 patients (69.5%) received an everolimus-eluting stent (EES), 133 patients (11.0%) received a zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES), and 236 patients (19.5%) received a biodegradable polymer, biolimus-eluting stent (BP-BES). During a mean follow-up of 722 ± 640 days, TLR occurred in 47 patients (3.8%). At univariate analysis, EES patients had a lower TLR rate (3.6% vs 4.5% in ZES vs 4.2% in BP-BES), which was statistically significant at multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.93; P=.03). No differences in major adverse cardiac events, death, MI, or ST were observed between groups.
Conclusion: The safety profile of the stents used was comparable over the follow-up period. However, EES patients had lower restenosis rates, with a reduced need for repeat PCI.
Keywords: comparative effectiveness; drug-eluting stent; left main coronary artery disease; patient-centered outcomes research.