A meta-analysis of the incidence of complications associated with groin access after the use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in trauma patients

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Sep;85(3):626-634. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001978.

Abstract

Background: Serious complications related to groin access have been reported with the use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the incidence of complications related to groin access from the use of REBOA in adult trauma patients.

Methods: We identified articles in MEDLINE and EMBASE. We reviewed all studies that involved adult trauma patients who underwent the placement of a REBOA and included only those that reported the incidence of complications related to groin access. A meta-analysis of proportions was performed.

Results: We identified 13 studies with a total of 424 patients. REBOA was inserted most commonly by trauma surgeons or emergency room physicians. Information regarding puncture technique was reported in 12 studies and was available for a total of 414 patients. Percutaneous access and surgical cutdown were performed in 304 (73.4%) and 110 (26.5%) patients, respectively. Overall, complications related to groin access occurred in 5.6% of patients (n = 24/424). Lower limb amputation was required in 2.1% of patients (9/424), of which three cases (3/424 [0.7%]) were directly related to the vascular puncture from the REBOA insertion. A meta-analysis that used the logit transformation showed a 5% (95% CI 3%-9%) incidence of complications without significant heterogeneity (LR test: χ = 0.73, p = 0.2, Tau-square = 0.2). In a second meta-analysis, we used the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation and found an incidence of complications of 4% (95% CI 2%-7%) with low heterogeneity (I = 16.3%).

Conclusion: We found that the incidence of complications related to groin access was of 4-5% based on a meta-analysis of 13 studies published worldwide. Currently, there are no benchmarks or quality measures as a reference to compare, and thus, further work is required to identify these benchmarks and improve the practice of REBOA in trauma surgery.

Level of evidence: Systematic review and meta-analysis, level III.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Amputation, Surgical / statistics & numerical data
  • Aorta / injuries
  • Aorta / pathology
  • Aorta / surgery*
  • Balloon Occlusion / adverse effects
  • Balloon Occlusion / methods
  • Endovascular Procedures / instrumentation*
  • Female
  • Groin / anatomy & histology
  • Groin / pathology
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Intraoperative Complications / epidemiology
  • Lower Extremity / pathology
  • Lower Extremity / surgery
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Punctures / adverse effects
  • Punctures / methods
  • Resuscitation / methods
  • Shock, Hemorrhagic / complications
  • Shock, Hemorrhagic / epidemiology
  • Shock, Hemorrhagic / mortality
  • Wounds and Injuries / complications
  • Wounds and Injuries / epidemiology*
  • Wounds and Injuries / therapy