Improved detectability of acute and subacute brainstem infarctions by combining standard axial and thin-sliced sagittal DWI

PLoS One. 2018 Jul 3;13(7):e0200092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200092. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Background and purpose: Most false negative findings in DWI of ischemic stroke are in patients with minor deficits clinically localized to the brainstem. Our goal was to evaluate the benefit of a thin-sliced sagittal DWI in addition to conventional axial DWI at 1.5T for the detection of brainstem infarctions.

Methods: Data of patients with symptoms consistent with acute and subacute brainstem infarction and an MRI examination including standard axial DWI and thin-sliced sagittal DWI were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with the later diagnosis of a TIA, an inflammation or a tumor of the brainstem were excluded from analysis. Diffusion restrictions were identified by two independent raters blinded for the final clinical diagnosis in three separate reading steps: First, only axial DWI, secondly only sagittal DWI, and lastly both DWIs together. Presence and size of DWI-lesions were documented for each plane. Differences between the observers were settled in consensus in a separate joint reading.

Results: Of 73 included patients, 46 patients were clinically diagnosed with brainstem infarction. Inter-observer agreement was excellent for the detection of brainstem lesions in axial and sagittal DWI (kappa = 0.94 and 0.97). In 28/46 patients (60.9%) lesions were detected in the axial plane alone, whereas in 6 more patients (73.9%) lesions were detected in the review of both sequences together. All lesions undetectable in the axial plane were smaller than 5 mm in cranio-caudal direction.

Conclusions: Thin-sliced sagittal DWI in addition to axial DWI improves the detection rate of brainstem infarction with little additional expenditure of time.

MeSH terms

  • Brain Stem / diagnostic imaging
  • Brain Stem Infarctions / diagnostic imaging*
  • Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods*
  • Humans
  • Observer Variation
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sensitivity and Specificity

Grants and funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.