Do individual versus illness belief schema differ in the prediction of post-stroke recovery?

J Health Psychol. 2020 Nov-Dec;25(13-14):2118-2128. doi: 10.1177/1359105318785446. Epub 2018 Jul 12.

Abstract

This longitudinal observational study examined how individual versus illness belief schema compare as predictors of post-stroke recovery. A total of 42 stroke survivors (mean age = 66.9 years/range = 29-96 years; 68% male) were involved. The primary outcome, Health-Related Quality of Life was measured using EQ-5D-5L, mood using Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and disability using Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale. Stroke Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised measured illness beliefs. Linear regressions showed that individual illness beliefs significantly explained more of the variance in 3-month post-stroke recovery than schema (7.4%-22.5% versus 1.9%-9.9%). Individual versus illness belief schema predict outcomes differently, but which approach predicts outcomes better remains unclear.

Keywords: Common Sense Model; Health-Related Quality of Life; cluster analysis; disability; illness belief schema; illness beliefs; mood; recovery; stroke.

Publication types

  • Observational Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Activities of Daily Living
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Quality of Life*
  • Recovery of Function
  • Stroke Rehabilitation
  • Stroke*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Survivors