Objective: To investigate current status of acceptance of disability and hope level in burn patients and the correlation. Methods: Totally 216 hospitalized burn patients conforming to the study criteria were admitted to Department of Burns of Fujian Medical University Union Hospital from September 2016 to May 2017. Self-made General Information Questionnaire, Acceptance of Disability Scale-Revised and Herth Hope Index score were adopted to investigate condition of acceptance of disability and hope level of burn patients with different general information and to record the score, score of acceptance of disability and the dimensions, score of hope level and the dimensions of 216 patients. Correlation between scores of acceptance of disability and hope level and their dimensions was analyzed. Data were processed with t test, one-way analysis of variance, and Pearson correlation analysis. Results: (1) Scores of acceptance of disability and hope level of patients with different age, gender, and relationship status were close (t=-1.299, -0.249, -1.142, -0.315, F=1.168, 2.362, P>0.05). There were statistically significant differences in score of acceptance of disability and hope level of patients with different burn sequela, inhalation injury, education level, population category, home address, burn degree, and burn depth (t=9.581, 7.854, -8.385, -7.972, F=2.989, 2.958, 7.759, 4.928, 8.099, 8.489, 44.942, 32.071, 8.221, 5.570, P<0.05 or P<0.01). (2) Score of acceptance of disability of patients was (70.4±19.0) points, which was in medium level. Among 4 dimensions of acceptance of disability of patients, dimension of expansion of values scope had the highest score [(22.1±6.0) points], and it was followed by dimension of transformation from comparison value to fixed value [(20.1±5.9) points] and dimension of tolerance for disability's influence [(18.9±6.3) points], and dimension of subordination to body shape had the lowest score [(9.3±2.8) points]. (3) Score of hope level of patients was (31.2±7.8) points, which was in medium level. Among 3 dimensions of hope level, dimension of keeping close relationship with other people had the highest score [(10.8±2.6) points], and it was followed by dimension of taking positive action [(10.6±2.5) points], and dimension of positive attitude to reality and future had the lowest score [(9.9±3.1) points]. (4) There were significantly positive correlations between scores of acceptance of disability and its dimensions and hope level and its dimensions of patients (with r values from 0.522 to 0.884, P<0.01). Conclusions: Burn patients with different general information have different scores of acceptance of disability and hope level. Acceptance of disability and hope level of patients with burns need to be improved, and there is significantly positive correlation between acceptance of disability and hope level.
目的: 了解烧伤患者伤残接受度、希望水平现状,并探讨两者之间的相关性。 方法: 2016年9月—2017年5月福建医科大学附属协和医院烧伤科收治216例符合入选标准的住院烧伤患者,采用自制一般资料调查表及伤残接受度量表(修订版)和希望因子量表,前瞻性调查不同一般资料烧伤患者伤残接受度及希望水平情况并记录其得分,216例患者伤残接受度及其各维度得分、希望水平及其各维度得分,并分析伤残接受度及其各维度得分与希望水平及其各维度得分的相关性。对数据行t检验、单因素方差分析及Pearson相关分析。 结果: (1)不同年龄、性别、婚恋状况的患者伤残接受度及希望水平得分相近(t=-1.299、-0.249、-1.142、-0.315,F=1.168、2.362,P>0.05)。不同烧伤后遗症、吸入性损伤、受教育程度、人群类别、家庭居住地、烧伤严重程度、烧伤深度患者伤残接受度及希望水平得分比较,差异有统计学意义(t=9.581、7.854、-8.385、-7.972,F=2.989、2.958、7.759、4.928、8.099、8.489、44.942、32.071、8.221、5.570,P<0.05或P<0.01)。(2)患者伤残接受度得分为(70.4±19.0)分,处于中等水平。伤残接受度中价值观范围的扩大维度得分[(22.1±6.0)分]最高,其次为从对比价值到固有价值转变维度[(20.1±5.9)分]、对伤残影响的包容维度[(18.9±6.3)分],身体形态从属性维度得分[(9.3±2.8)分]最低。(3)患者希望水平得分为(31.2±7.8)分,处于中等水平。希望水平中与他人保持亲密关系维度得分[(10.8±2.6)分]最高,其次为采取积极行动维度[(10.6±2.5)分],对现实和未来的积极态度维度得分[(9.9±3.1)分]最低。(4)患者伤残接受度及其各维度得分与希望水平及其各维度得分呈明显正相关,r值为0.522~0.884,P<0.01。 结论: 不同一般资料烧伤患者伤残接受度及希望水平得分不同,烧伤患者伤残接受度及希望水平有待提高,其伤残接受度与希望水平呈明显正相关。.
Keywords: Acceptance of disability; Burns; Hope.