Amid proton transfer (APT) and magnetization transfer (MT) MRI contrasts provide complimentary assessment of brain tumors similarly to proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging (MRSI)

Eur Radiol. 2019 Mar;29(3):1203-1210. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5615-8. Epub 2018 Aug 13.

Abstract

Objectives: Using MRSI as comparison, we aimed to explore the difference between amide proton transfer (APT) MRI and conventional semi-solid magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) MRI, and to investigate if molecular APT and structural MTR can provide complimentary information in assessing brain tumors.

Methods: Seventeen brain tumor patients and 17 age- and gender-matched volunteers were included and scanned with anatomical MRI, APT and MT-weighted MRI, and MRSI. Multi-voxel choline (Cho) and N-acetylaspartic acid (NAA) signals were quantified from MRSI and compared with MTR and MTRasym(3.5ppm) contrasts averaged from corresponding voxels. Correlations between contrasts were explored voxel-by-voxel by pooling values from all voxels into Pearson's correlation analysis. Differences in correlation coefficients were tested with the Z-test (set at p<0.05).

Results: APT and MT provide good contrast and quantitative parameters in tumor imaging, as do the metabolite (Cho and NAA) maps. MTRasym(3.5ppm) significantly correlated with MTR (R=-0.61, p<0.0001), Cho (R=0.568, p<0.0001) and NAA (R=-0.619, p<0.0001) in tumors, and MTR also significantly correlated with Cho (R=-0.346, p<0.0001) and NAA (R=0.624, p<0.0001). In healthy volunteers, MTRasym(3.5ppm) was non-significantly correlated with MTR (R=-0.049, p=0.239), Cho (R=0.030, p=0.478) and NAA (R=-0.083, p=0.046). Significant correlations were found among MTR with Cho (R=0.199, p<0.0001) and NAA (R=0.263, p<0.0001) in the group of healthy volunteers with lower correlation R values than those in tumor patients.

Conclusions: APT and MT could provide independent and supplementary information for the comprehensive assessment of molecular and structural changes due to brain tumor cancerogenesis.

Key points: • MTR asym(3.5ppm) positively correlated with Cho while negatively with NAA in tumors. • MTR positively correlated with NAA while negatively with Cho in tumors. • Combining APT/MT provides molecular and structural information similarly to MRSI.

Keywords: Amide proton transfer; Brain tumor; Magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging; Magnetization transfer.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Amides / metabolism*
  • Brain / diagnostic imaging
  • Brain / metabolism*
  • Brain Neoplasms / diagnosis
  • Brain Neoplasms / metabolism*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Positron-Emission Tomography / methods*
  • Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy / methods*
  • Protons
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Amides
  • Protons