A critical part of the clinical development path for a therapeutic antibody involves evaluating the physical and chemical stability of candidate molecules throughout the manufacturing process. In particular, the risks of chemical liabilities that can impact antigen binding, such as deamidation, oxidation, and isomerization in the antibody CDR sequences, need to be controlled through formulation development or eliminated by replacing the amino acid motif displaying the chemical instability. Commonly, the antibody CDR sequence contains multiple sequence motifs (potential hotspots) for chemical instability. However, only a subset of these motifs results in actual chemical modification, and thus, experimental assessment of the extent of instability is necessary to identify positions for potential sequence engineering. Ideally, this information should be available prior to antibody humanization at the stage of parental rodent antibody identification. Early knowledge of liabilities allows for ranking of clones or the mitigation of liabilities by concurrent engineering with the antibody humanization process instead of time-consuming sequential activities. However, concurrent engineering of chemical liabilities and humanization requires translatability of the chemical modifications from the rodent parental antibody to the humanized. We experimentally compared the stability of all sequence motifs by mass spectrometric peptide mapping between the rodent parental antibody and the final humanized antibody and observed a linear correlation. These results have enabled a streamlined developability assessment process for therapeutic antibodies from lead discovery to clinical development.
Keywords: deamidation; developability assessment; isomerization; oxidation.