Purpose: Epilepsy surgery is the most successful method of treating medically unresponsive epilepsy, but carries a risk of morbidity. PET/MR is an emerging technique that increases detection of focal lesions whose resection may result in symptom remission.
Methods: Retrospective review of 74 focal epilepsy patients over a period of 3 years who had a PET/MR was performed following IRB permission and informed consent. 27 patients underwent surgery or RNS (responsive neurostimulator) placement.
Results: Hybrid PET-MR identified new anatomic or functional lesions in 10 patients not identified with standalone 3 T MR. Of the 27 patients who underwent focal surgery (19) or RNS placement (8), 24 showed improvement (Engel's I-III), 2 did not (Engel's IV), and one had an RNS explanted due to infection. MR and PET were read by 2 separate neuroradiologists and nuclear medicine physicians, respectively. Modalities were evaluated in terms of ability to detect the correct lobe and side for a focal lesion whose resection improved symptoms. Prior standalone MR exhibited 71-77% sensitivity and 0% specificity (as there were only 2 nonresponders), MR associated with PET/MR had 68-71% sensitivity and 0-50% specificity (depending on whether a lesion was seen on one of the nonresponders), and PET had 68-71% sensitivity and 25-33% specificity. Using either PET or MR to identify a focal lesion, PET/MR had sensitivity of 78-82% and specificity 0-50%.
Conclusions: PET-MR provides additional sensitivity when used as two combined modalities for detecting possible epileptic foci.
Keywords: Epilepsy; Epilepsy surgery; PET-MR.
Copyright © 2018 British Epilepsy Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.