Comparative Effectiveness of an mTOR-Based Systemic Therapy Regimen in Advanced, Metaplastic and Nonmetaplastic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Oncologist. 2018 Nov;23(11):1300-1309. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0498. Epub 2018 Aug 23.

Abstract

Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous disease with subtypes having different "targetable" molecular aberrations. Metaplastic breast cancers (MpBCs) are typically TNBCs and commonly have alterations in the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. We previously reported efficacy for an mTOR-based chemotherapy regimen in MpBC. To determine if tumor subtype influences prognosis, we compared treatment outcomes of patients with MpBC with those of patients with nonmetaplastic TNBC receiving an mTOR-based systemic therapy regimen.

Patients and methods: Patients with advanced MpBC and nonmetaplastic TNBC were treated at our institution from April 16, 2009, through November 4, 2014, using mTOR inhibition (temsirolimus or everolimus) with liposomal doxorubicin and bevacizumab (DAT/DAE). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate associations between tumor histology and outcomes. Multivariable models were adjusted for all covariates.

Results: Fourteen patients with nonmetaplastic TNBC and 59 patients with advanced MpBC were treated with DAT/DAE. MpBC patients were older (p = .002) and less likely to have a history of bevacizumab use (p = .023). Median PFS for the nonmetaplastic TNBC and MpBC patients was 2.5 months and 4.8 months, respectively. This difference in PFS was statistically significant on univariable (p = .006) but not multivariable analysis (p = .087). Median OS for the nonmetaplastic TNBC and MpBC patients was 3.7 months and 10.0 months, respectively (p = .0003). MpBC remained significantly associated with improved OS on multivariable analysis (p < .0001).

Conclusion: In our study, DAT/DAE appeared to be more effective in MpBC compared with nonmetaplastic TNBC. These data support patient selection for targeted therapy in TNBC.

Implications for practice: Metaplastic breast cancers (MpBCs) represent <1% of all breast cancers, demonstrate mesenchymal differentiation, and are typically resistant to chemotherapy. Patients with advanced MpBC treated with an mTOR-based systemic therapy regimen had better long-term outcomes compared with patients with nonmetaplastic triple-negative breast cancer treated with the same regimen, suggesting that metaplastic histology may predict benefit from agents targeting the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway.

摘要

背景。三阴性乳腺癌 (TNBC) 是一种异质性疾病,其亚型具有不同的“可靶向”分子畸变。化生性乳腺癌 (MpBC) 通常是 TNBC,并且 PI3K/Akt/mTOR 通路通常发生改变。我们之前报告了基于 mTOR 的化疗方案对 MpBC 的效果。为了确定肿瘤亚型是否影响预后,我们比较了 MpBC 患者与接受基于 mTOR 的系统治疗方案的非化生性 TNBC 患者的治疗效果。

患者和方法。2009 年 4 月 16 日至 2014 年 11 月 4 日,我们机构采用 mTOR 抑制剂(替西罗莫司或依维莫司)搭配脂质体多柔比星和贝伐珠单抗 (DAT/DAE) 对晚期 MpBC 和非化生性 TNBC 患者进行治疗。我们通过 Kaplan‐Meier 法估算了患者的中位无进展生存期 (PFS) 和总生存期 (OS)。我们采用 Cox 回归分析评估了肿瘤组织学与预

后之间的关系 并针对所有协变量调整了多变量模型。结果。14名非化生性 TNBC 患者与 59 名晚期 MpBC 患者接受了 DAT/DAE 的治疗。MpBC 患者年龄较大 (p = 0.002)和贝伐珠单抗使用史的较少 (p = 0.023)。非化生性 TNBC 和 MpBC 患者的中位 PFS 分别为 2.5 个月和 4.8 个月。PFS 的这种差异在单变量分析中具有统计学意义 (p = 0.006),但在多变量分析则不具有统计学意义 (p = 0.087)。非化生性 TNBC 患者和 MpBC 患者的中位 OS 分别为 3.7 个月和 10.0 个月 (p = 0.000 3)。在多变量分析 (p < 0.0001) 中,MpBC 始终与 OS 的改善关系密切。

结论。我们的研究显示,DAT/DAE 对 MpBC 的效果优于对非化生性 TNBC 的效果。这些数据可帮助 TNBC 患者选择靶向治疗方案。

对临床实践的提示: 化生性乳腺癌 (MpBC) 占所有乳腺癌的比例 <1%,表现出间质分化,并且通常对化疗具有耐药性。采用基于 mTOR 系统治疗方案的晚期 MpBC 患者的长期预后效果优于采用相同治疗方案的非化生三阴性乳腺癌患者的长期预后效果,表明化生组织可能预测针对 PI3K/Akt/mTOR通路的制剂的疗效

Keywords: Mesenchymal; Metaplastic breast cancer; Triple‐negative breast cancer; mTOR inhibitor.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Prognosis
  • TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases / genetics*
  • Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms / pathology

Substances

  • MTOR protein, human
  • TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases