Quantitative and thematic analysis of burns surgeons' attitudes, beliefs and surgical decision-making in self-harm burn injuries: The use of a questionnaire and hypothetical cases

Background: Self-harm injuries represent a significant minority of attendances within burns services. However, there is minimal research exploring burns surgeons' attitudes and beliefs about self-harm and how treatment decisions are made.

Method: Burns surgeons (n=37) completed a questionnaire which measured attitudes and beliefs about self-harm. Surgical decision-making was also explored by prompting surgeons to make treatment decisions for hypothetical case scenarios, and describe their rationale behind their decisions.

Results: The majority of surgeons reported positive attitudes about self-harm. However, around one in ten judged patients who self-harm more negatively, around a fifth offer surgery less frequently and almost a quarter believed that surgery should only be offered a limited number of times in repeated self-harm. Unhelpful or inaccurate beliefs (e.g. self-harm is 'attention seeking,' surgery would reinforce the self-harm, and that patients who self-harm tamper with skin grafts) were evident in some surgeons. Thematic analysis of qualitative data describing surgical decisions identified five themes: Equal Access to Care; Multidisciplinary Working; Old or Unhelpful Stories; Concerns about Tampering; and Repeated vs. First Time Self-Harm Episodes. More experienced surgeons were less judgmental, more likely to offer surgical interventions, and less likely to hold unhelpful or inaccurate beliefs compared to junior surgeons.

Conclusions: Some surgeons are not acting in line with UK guidance on the management of self-harm injuries. Education on the topic of self-harm is essential in burns services and this may be particularly important early on during surgical careers. Prospective research regarding surgical treatments and outcomes following self-harm is required.