Detection of Herpes Simplex Virus and Varicella-Zoster Virus by Traditional and Multiplex Molecular Methods

Am J Clin Pathol. 2019 Jan 1;151(1):122-126. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqy111.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare multiplex nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) that detect and differentiate herpes simplex virus (HSV) and varicella-zoster virus (VZV) with traditional virologic assays.

Methods: The HSV ELVIS Test System (Quidel, San Diego, CA) and/or Light Diagnostics VZV direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) kit (Millipore Sigma, Billerica, MA), as well as an ARIES HSV 1&2/VZV assay (Luminex, Austin, TX) and the Solana HSV1 + 2/VZV Assay (Quidel), were performed on non-cerebrospinal fluid specimens.

Results: The sensitivities/specificities for the ELVIS, Aries, and Solana assays for HSV were 71.1%/93.2%, 94.9%/93.2%, and 94.7%/100%, respectively. The sensitivities/specificities for the DFA, Aries, and Solana assays for VZV were 71.4%/100%, 100%/96.0%, and 95.3%/100%, respectively. HSV and VZV were detected but clinically unsuspected in 5.4% and 4.2% of the specimens, respectively.

Conclusions: Both NAAT assays were comparable and more sensitive than traditional methods. The recovery of unsuspected HSV and VZV from clinical specimens supports the implementation of a combined HSV/VZV assay.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Direct
  • Herpesvirus 2, Human / genetics
  • Herpesvirus 2, Human / isolation & purification*
  • Herpesvirus 3, Human / genetics
  • Herpesvirus 3, Human / isolation & purification*
  • Humans
  • Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Simplexvirus / genetics
  • Simplexvirus / isolation & purification*
  • Varicella Zoster Virus Infection